Hey, have you ever seen the film “Haunter”?
(I think you mean “The Haunting”. There’s the original 1963 film by Robert Wise and then there’s- )
No, I don’t mean “The Haunting”. I mean “Haunter”
(Oh!!! You mean that 1995 film with Kate Beckinsale.)
NO!! That’s “Haunted!” I’m referring to “HauntER!” “er!” “er!” er!” “er!”
Oh never mind!!
Truth be told, I had never heard of this film either (until I found it on Shudder.com a couple months ago) It premiered in 2013, but according to Wikipedia, this Canadian film had a limited release in U.S. theaters. Released on video in 2014, it only took in $129, 477. Suffice it to say, it didn’t get much exposure. Equally disappointing are the lukewarm reviews. Fifty-four percent of professional critics cited on Rottentomatoes rated this film positively – a slim majority. But there are plenty of professional critics that panned the film. Rex Reed of the New Yorks Observer writes that the film is “A dull, confusing movie for which nobody provided a script” Meanwhile, only forty-two percent of the non-professional critics (audience) view the film favorably. IMDB gives this a rating of 5.9 stars out of 10.
All this is sad to me, because I think this is an underrated film that is too good to be hidden from the masses. It is NOT dull. In fact, it is quite the opposite; I was drawn in immediately. It only took a few scenes before I had dissolved into the mystery of the house that is at the heart of this story. Is it a confusing movie? Perhaps at times. It is complex but in a captivating way. It is non-linear. Characters weave in and out of various timelines. They tunnel into different dimensions; the dimension of the living and the dimension of the dead. There is a lot packed into this 97-minute film. There is layer upon layer of awesomeness. And yet, the film doesn’t feel rushed. Nor does the plot feel oppressive and burdensome.
It is difficult to explain the plot without giving away spoilers. On all of the major review sites, a spoiler sticks out in the very first lines of the synopsis. I understand the reasoning behind its inclusion: the heart of the story beats according to this revelation. But I swear, for the first 15-20 minutes of the film, the revelation is not immediately apparent. Having read the various synopses, I knew what this revelation was before beginning the film, and yet I let myself flow freely in the directions that the plot was taking me, so much so that I nearly forgot the surprise.
In some of my reviews, I do post spoilers. Normally I warn the reader about this. Depending upon what I want to achieve with the article, I sometimes need to give things away. If I’m doing an analysis of major themes, for example, it is sometimes necessary to reveal key plot point and twists. For The Haunter, I wish to give nothing away. I am even omitting things that major review sites list freely. I want this to be a surprise from start to finish. I want it to be like the roller coaster that it is; with exciting twists and turns.
I’ll close this review by starting a new subject, hopefully to be continued in the future I consider “Haunter” to be a post-modern film. It’s non-linear and it lacks a center, so to speak. Some other haunted house stories that fall into this category are The House at the End of Time , a film and House of Leaves, a book. So I ask, are there commonalities across all post-modern haunted house stories that are limited to its genre? Are there certain themes that are begging to be discovered and analyzed? I don’t know. This would be an interesting avenue to explore. And that’s what we do here at the Haunted House Poject – drive down avenues that behold such wonderful houses of haunts!