Review of Hell House, LLC

For as long as I remember, I have loved haunted house amusement attractions. (Wait, scratch that! I hated my first couple pass-throughs. I was a little kid and I was scared shitless. So why did I begin with “for as long as I can remember, I have loved…?”  Because, silly, it’s a great phrase for which to begin an article!). Every once in a while, a movie comes along that features  such an attraction. I always try to see these films. There is The Funhouse, for example, directed by the famed Tobe Hooper. Four kids are trapped inside a funhouse overnight.  I seem to recall this film having mixed reviews, but oh well, I love it and will rewatch it from time to time.  Since the setting does not take place in an actual haunted house but rather a carnival ride,  I have not reviewed this film at this blog.  There are no paranormal events in the film either.  Then there is The Houses October Built Great title, good movie. It’s a film consisting of four or five young people who travel  the states in search of the ultimate “haunt” (another term for a haunted house amusement attraction. This makes more sense, because these attractions are not really meant to be haunted houses but a series of horrific displays varying in theme), until a haunt finds them. This time around, I did review the film. Why? I don’t know, I somehow convinced myself this was more closer to a haunted house movie than The Funhouse. Was I wrong in this distinction? Probably.  Sue me, I guess.

Finally, the heavens above sent forth a movie made just for me  (heavens = Shudder.com). It’s a movie about a haunted house amusement attraction that is, in fact, really haunted.   From what I can tell, this film is exclusive to Shudder, and it was one of the reasons I renewed my subscription this past Halloween season, a subscription that hadn’t been active for years.

The premise: ghosts and/or demons cause deadly shenanigans on this haunt’s opening night. Imagine following a line of people through the cramped passageways, only to suddenly have to reverse.  “Go back, go back” people in front of you are shouting. Something terrible has happened at the very last exhibit. An emergency. Carnage.  When all is said and done, police and emergency vehicles are everywhere.  And several people are dead.  WTF happened?  Well, the answer to the question is the crux of the film.

Oh yeah, I forgot to mention; the name of both the haunt and the film is Hell House LLC.

The film begins as a documentary that has been filmed after the events of the story. It starts with interviews of people that have second-hand knowledge of what might have happened on that tragic night, then continues with an interview with Sara Havel, the sole surviving crew member.  

Sara has in her possession a video of the events that lead up to opening-night horrors. It just so happens that one of the crew members documented all the prepping activities with his camera. There’s always some guy or girl in these flicks that do that,  isn’t there?  The rest of the film is pretty much the video itself.  You know what this means, don’t you?  Yep, you guessed it.  Hell House LLC is a found-footage movie.

I have no idea how you the reader of this piece feels about found-footage movies.  For me, it depends on how good the story is and how little the camera operators annoy us with a shaking camera.  But if you’re one of those that has made up your mind that you absolutely hate found-footage films, I implore you to still see this movie.  It’s a great movie and when the camera does shake in enhances the scares (like when the customers are fleeing the haunt.)

The film follows a group of haunters during Halloween season  as they “set-up camp”, if you will, in Rockland County, New York, determined to convert the abandoned Abaddon Hotel into the area’s one and only haunted attraction.  The hotel itself is the subject of dark legends. Supposedly, way back in the ancient days of the 1980s, some cult leader named Andrew Tully tried to open a portal to hell on the premises. Two people went missing when he did this. Oh for Heaven’s sake Mr. Tully, couldn’t you be happy with the amenities the hotel provided?

Back to current time (2015). How are five or six people able to haul thousands of dollars worth of mechanical haunting props in a couple of cars, reconstruct the whole place, hire actors, and market the event in a 30-45 day time period? This doesn’t even include securing the rental contract and obtaining the necessary permits. I guess we the viewers are not supposed to be concerned with those things. These are experienced haunters, having operated in various places in past seasons.  So they know what they are doing and we’ll just have to trust them. Reasons not to trust them? For one thing, they are hosting a public event in a place where supposed demonic activity had taken place. And in the end people will die, so there’s that.

Actually, we the viewers do see the crew preparing for the haunt, day by day. Each new scene opens with the subtitle  “X amount of days until opening night” (I’m sure some days are skipped for the sake of the audience. The movie is supposed to scare us to death, not bore us to death. Maybe those were the days they filed the paperwork and received incoming shipments?) 

There are some genuinely creepy scenes in this film. There’s the clown dummy that just won’t stay in one place. There are these shadow things that just appear out of nowhere. And some members of the crew get possessed from time to time.  For you folks out there that love twists, the film as you covered. 

This film is not to be confused with Richard Matheson’s book  “Hell House”.  The corresponding movie is titled The Legend of Hell House. When I first saw the title “Hell House, LLC”, I immediately thought it was either a sequel or remake of Matheson’s story. Matheson’s story is a great book, and the movie is great too. but it’s an entirely different animal.  It’s the “LLC” that distinguishes the modern film  Gotta love the “LLC!”

Guess what?  There’s a Hell House 2, 3, and an origins film. Many of these have gotten good reviews. Therefore, I really am looking forward to binge watching these sequels, more so than other successful horror films that had follow ups. So much fun! It’s great to be me!

Review of The Haunted Palace and a Tribute to Roger Corman

Saying Goodbye to Roger Corman 

RogerCormanLast week we lost a legend.  Roger Corman died two years shy of his 100th birthday. Known as the B-movie king, Corman’s filmography is extensive. He produced hundreds of films and contributed significantly to the horror genre.  So I thought I would review one of his films as a sort of tribute.

I’ve seen several but still not many Corman films, considering the mammoth list of films credited to his name. Of the ones I’ve seen, they make their markings all over the likeability scale. I didn’t care for The Undead, for instance.  I am most familiar with his films reimagining to stories of Edgar Allan Poe, of which there are eight.  The Raven has very little in common with the themes of Poe’s famous poem for which the film was made.  It is a fun film and just downright silly.

I loved House of Usher and The Masque of the Red Death. Both are somewhat true to their original stories, but in each case, the figurative concepts with these tales morph into literal, tangible phantoms once the camera captures them.  I have reviewed both these Poe tales, and yet, I have not reviewed these corresponding films of Corman. My excuse to myself was they were not “haunted-housey” enough. But that’s a weak excuse. If they were haunted- housey enough in print, wouldn’t they be haunted-housey enough in film?  So I guess in truth I just never got around to it.

Guess what?  I’m still not getting around to reviewing those films.  Instead, the film I am choosing to review is The Haunted Palace.  I figure, you know, it’s got the phrase “haunted (insert the name of a domicile here)” in its title, so…

Some will argue that despite the film’s title, it’s not a haunted house film.  Their views are not without merit. But I suggest it is.  There is a creepy castle with portraits and winding, stone staircases.  There are large fireplaces and secret passages. There is an overall gothic flavor to this film. Within Gothic literature, something that is “haunted” can simply mean being possessed with troubling things that linger.  Linger they do in this film. Finally, the movie’s called “The Haunted Palace” so contrary to what I wrote earlier, I shall not “despite the film’s title!”

THE HAUNTED PALACE

HauntedPalaceScene

 

“Haunted, not by ghosts. By fear, by guilt, by memory of a particular night”

 

This line is spoken by the village doctor. Played by Frank Maxwell, he is explaining to a couple that is visiting the town of Arkham why their presence is upsetting the locals.   I don’t know why these two visitors should have been so perplexed by their unwelcoming ways.  After all, the male counterpart of this couple, Charles Dexter Ward, is played by the great Vincent Price and he’s running his mouth off about inheriting the creepy palace that stands at the top of the hill overlooking the town.  Vincent Price in a haunted house overlooking the town! That is never a good thing for characters in a movie.

As it turns out, one hundred years prior, a necromancer named Joseph Curwen lived in that palace.  He had a thing for hypnotically seducing young ladies of the village to the castle where he would force them to mate with the elder gods. The villagers didn’t take too kindly to this, so they tied the Joseph to a tree and burned him alive. Before he succumbed to the flames, Joseph cursed the village. He also vowed to one day return from the dead and have revenge. Necromancers will do that; return from the dead.  Low and behold, one hundred years later, Curwen’s ancestor comes to town. This, of course, is Charles Dexter Ward.  Vincent Price plays both Curwen and Ward.  The portrait of Curwen that hangs in the castle looks exactly like Ward (well of course it does, it’s a drawing of the same actor).  So naturally, the townspeople are freaked out.  They believe in the curse. For proof, they look at their children. So many are born with deformities.

Throughout the movie, we see Price as the congenial Ward slowly surrender to the wretched personality of his late ancestor Curwen.  The omen bares out. Curwen’s soul takes possession of Ward.  Price is brilliant during these personality changes. With slight changes of facial expressions, with fluctuations in vocal inflection, he brings these characters to life. At one point in the film, with his wavering of expressions and tone, we aren’t sure who he is at the moment, which is the whole point of the scene.

This film is based on the works of two classic authors of horror: Edgar Allan Poe and H.P. Lovecraft.  The title, The Haunted Palace, is derived from a poem of Poe’s. It was incorporated into Poe’s story The Fall of the House of Usher.  To be honest, it’s not the easiest poem to comprehend.  It’s not that long and you can read it in its entirety here:

As I do so often, when I’m clueless about the meaning of something, I see what good ol’ Wikipedia has to say on the subject. 

The poem is about a king from the days of yore; content, dignified and wise until the great assault.  Assault of “evil things in robes of sorrow, assails the monarch’s high estate”

It is implied the king has gone mad. The assault, perhaps, are the thoughts, emotions, and perceptions that exist to drive one insane.  Thus, the palace referenced by in the title, is actually the king’s own head.  I find this an intriguing concept. There is no scarier haunted house than the head that houses a troubled mind. I’ve thought of similar analogies but of course, Poe always beats me to these concepts, rendering me a useless plagiarizer. (Of course he had the advantage of living long before I was born.)

The story itself is based on H. P. Lovecraft’s The Case of Charles Dexter Ward.  I have not read it, but according to my friend Wikipedia.

The story is about an escapee of a mental asylum, Charles Dexter Ward. He seeks out the grave of his long dead ancestor Joseph Curwen, a mass-murder and necromancer. Like his forefather, he too wants to resurrect the dead, and there is no better person to resurrect than the master resurrector himself.   

The movie itself, like most Corman movies based on literature, only loosely resembles the originals. Unlike the Poe poem, there are no kings.  Unlike the Lovecraft story, Curwen isn’t kidnapping women.  But –

  1. A story of a man losing his identity within the walls of a stone, gothic castle.   How very Poe!
  2. A tale of a necromancer seeking to mate captured women with the elder gods. How very Lovecraft!

In their own way, Corman and screenwriter Charles Beaumont capture the essence of the works of these two authors.

 

I must confess: this is not my favorite Corman film.  I like House of Usher and  The Masque of the Red Death more (both with Vincent Price! If I’m not mistaken, all of Corman’s Poe films feature Price).  But it’s an “okayish” kind of film.

Rest in Peace, Roger.  You worked hard down here on earth. All your many productions are a testament to that. So please, rest. You have earned it.